Women's Day Marches

I cannot even begin to explain my absolute disgust over the behaviour of a large percentage of women who participated in the marches organised in their honour.

I would be happier attending a Men's Day march than the atrocious farce that played out last Saturday all over the world.    With the exception, of course, of strictly Islamic countries who subjugate their women on a daily, if not hourly, basis.

The women that marched on that day do not represent me.   My great-grandmother was a suffragette and women of her ilk knew what it was like to be treated unequally.   Nothing, I repeat, nothing in today's world represses women in western countries.

The main message of the march was "my pussy my rules".  Very laudable sentiments, however, it has ALWAYS been your pussy and your rules.   President Trump, or any government in the western world for that matter, has never declared or insinuated otherwise.    The reason this "message" was jumped on by the rabid third wave feminists was as a result of the publication of a tape of Donald J Trump, recorded in 2005, where he alluded to the fact that some women were so lacking in any moral judgement and so desperate for their "five minutes of fame" that a man in a position of authority and power could "grab their pussies".    To my mind, this says far more about the type of women he was surrounded by at the time than the man who uttered these words.   Leaving aside the fact that the conversation was a private one, and between two males; the publication of it was a calculated effort by the Democratic National Congress and the Hillary Clinton campaign to smear and undermine Trump's reputation and suitability to be the next President of the United States.

Now please do not be confused when I say that I am not a huge fan of President Trump.   There are many facets of his personality I do not like.   However, his ability to run a business empire is legendary.   Has he made mistakes? Of course, he has, but he has bounced back every time.   He is just what the USA needs to stop the slow creep of globalism across the western world.

Back to the women's march, and the main messages I took from the millions of women who took part are:

1. MY BODY MY RULES - yes, but in the western world it is a fact that it is your body and your rules, that's why rape is illegal, you can have abortions, access to contraceptives, where what you like when you like, have plastic surgery if you want to.   I don't see why you feel the need to march for something you already have.
2. STOP THE PATRIARCHY - in the USA this could have been a reaction to Hillary Clinton's losing the Presidential Election.    Although it has been said that she threatened the victims of, and covered up after, her husband's alleged rape of several women.   Her manifesto was also enshrined in the furtherance of the globalist agenda, something that would eventually erode the rights that women currently hold in the USA.    Just because she has a vagina and a uterus doesn't make her the ideal candidate for President.   By contrast, in the UK there are two women in the highest positions of power, Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister Theresa May.    So the need to march for the rights of women there were somewhat dubious.   So in London, they decided to march to the US Embassy to protest the election of Trump!    Forgive me for saying this but, in a democracy, the people of the country vote and the winner was the one with the most votes.   It is certainly not the business of citizens of another country to descend upon the embassy of the country to express one's displeasure with their democratic process.   However, the ONE place that they DIDN'T march to was the Saudi Arabian Embassy, one of many Islamic countries where women are treated unfairly.   Yet no-one from the organisers of these marches has seemed to come up with a valid reason as to why not.
3. NO TO ISLAMOPHOBIA - WHAT?!   Islam, the religion where the Koran, Hadiths, Sunnah and Sirah all state that a woman is worth half of a man.   That if a woman is raped she has to have two MALE witnesses or she is condemned for having adulterous sex!   THAT ISLAMOPHOBIA?
4. WOMEN'S RIGHTS - there are no policies in the western world that discriminate against women.    Indeed there are a plethora of laws in place that positively discriminate in favour of women.   When questioned about this even ex-congresswoman Wendy Davis could not come up with a single policy that discriminates against women.
5. MISOGYNY - Where?  Who? When?  Some women were openly attacking Melania Trump because she is married to (their idea of) a misogynist.   Yet these self-same women would have likely voted for Hillary Clinton, whose husband is a known abuser.  I sense a theme here.

The fact that fifty of the organisations who were part of this march are supported by money from George Soros came as no surprise to me.    The fact that one of the organisers of the march in the USA was Linda Sarsour from the Arab American Association of New York, an association with proven links to HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood, is another indication that this march was not really for Women's rights, but to push an Islamist agenda.    This is all well and good while they are trying to overturn western civilisation, but Women's rights will be severely curtailed once they have dominion over our countries.    All you have to do is look at these pictures of life in Iran pre-religious coup and post to see how life has "evolved".

1970's

University of Tehran 1970's

University of Tehran 2016

Iranian airlines 2016

Ultimately, all these women did was to show themselves up for what they are; man-hating, entitled, whining, vulgar specimens of the female species, who have been duped and are too blind to see.

Critical thinking requires facts not feelings.