Skip to main content

Demographic suicide of Europe - Can it be reversed?






There is no doubt, to any rational, critical thinking person in the Western world, that Europe is going through as big a crisis as those of WW1 and WW2.   Unfortunately, the crisis we currently find ourselves in has been created or at least abetted by our own political leaders.

There has been much talk of the Frankfurt School and the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan, cultural marxism and the creep of Islamism within the West and Europe specifically.

We are told that we need to import immigrants from the third world countries in order to fill the demographic hole created by Europeans not breeding sufficiently.   The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan openly advocates the destruction of the European race, or at the very least its dilution.   So for decades, various countries have made it fiscally less and less desirable to procreate.   The married person's tax allowance was removed from UK citizens way back in the nineties, child benefit, in countries where it is paid, has not kept up with the "real life" cost of living, having a large family is frowned upon, with a few exceptions, most countries have an average of 1.4 children.   We ourselves have contributed to our imminent demise because we have succumbed to the pressure of the political elites and the social norms.

We could dig deeper into the morass that is the decline of native Europeans in Europe.   We can expose the move away from Christianity to a more secular way of life.   The Catholic church has always prohibited the use of contraception and abortion, this prohibition in the past upheld, to a certain extent, the continuous replacement of the European race.   Now the vacuum created by a more secular way of life has brought its own far more sinister problems.    There are so many threads that make up the web of deceit that has covered the West for decades.  However, we can coalesce the myriad of threads and, like a child's puzzle, we can trace them back to their sources.

  1. Cultural Marxism.   The idea that all cultures are in some way equal and that those from a more evolved cultural background should atone for the sins of their ancestors and accept the cultural change being reeked upon them.
  2. The secularisation of Europe.   Sovereign countries separated Church from State.   An act that whilst worthy at the beginning, couldn't have foreseen the droves of "Christians" who gave up their faith in the pursuit of what? Money? Status? Career? Power?  Leaving a vacuum to be filled by highly devout immigrants.
  3. Islam.Islamism. Radical Islam.  The rise in adherents to Islam and its gradual encroachment into the West and the Western rule of law has sought to undermine the secularist views of Western governments, but only in so far as advocating for Islam, not any other religious entity.
  4. Globalisation.   The richest men on earth seeking to control the "masses" while expanding their financial base.   They want this unrest, for too long the west has held democracy as the holy grail of cultural cohesion.   The elites despise democracy in the same way that they despise the "masses".   The two together stand in the way of their plans.   Global domination.
  5. Communism.   An ideology that on paper seems sound.  In practice, it's not.   Communism doesn't take into account the individuality of each human being, preferring to concentrate on the collective.   It doesn't work and never has.  This accounts for the mindless followers of Political correctness whose only arsenal against criticism of all they hold dear is rhetoric.   No substantive proof, just name-calling and marginalisation.   The followers of this ideology have polluted the minds of people who have been told what to think instead of how to think.   The politics of right and left have also bought into this utopian world view, whilst trying to remain relevant to their voter base.
A recent article by the Gatestone Institute references the demise in Italy and Spain's population.   This is the very justification used to bring millions of migrants into Europe under the pretext of needing people to contribute to the tax base.   This would work in theory.   In practice, however, the very people they are importing into Europe have no intention of integrating or working for that matter, as is evidenced by the small percentage of immigrants into Germany that have found gainful employment.  The welfare benefits that the vast majority of recently arrived immigrants (and previous generations of immigrants who have chosen not to work) receive are paid for by taxes levied on the people who do work.   The working population pay for the education, welfare, living expenses and health of those who choose to move to Europe with no intention of contributing to the country they are leeching off.   So the argument of the importation of migrants to replace the dwindling population is baseless.   If they were willing to integrate and work then their importation would have some merit.

Essentially, we are being told about the dangers to the planet of overpopulation.   Nature has a perverse way of bringing everything back into balance.   Let us hope that humankind can wake up quickly enough to expunge the nihilistic, communist group think.   Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, what they are not entitled to do is exploit others to achieve this end.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10133/europe-disappearing 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lord Taverne slams the will of the people.

Last night (13 March 2017) the House of Commons voted on the Bill to trigger Article 50 of the Lis bon Trea ty .   This Bill allows the government of the UK to set in motion the process of separation from the European Union, nine months after the people of the UK voted, via a referendum, to leave. Despite the best efforts of Gina Miller (a Soros stooge) and a cabal of self-interested parties to block the UK government from trying to exit without parliamentary approval; a move that was upheld by several self-interested High Court and Supreme Court Judges were proven fruitless.   In compliance with the court directive, the UK government tabled a Bill laying out the specifics of exiting the EU.   Passed by the House of Commons, it went up to the House of Lords, who rejected the Bill and returned it to the elected House with amendments.   The amendments were overturned by the elected House of Commons and it has since passed in the House of...

Pot and Kettle!!!

It never fails to amaze me that some people in positions of power have the nerve to judge countries when their own home nation is not known for banging the same drum..... The UN Human Rights Chief, Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein from Saudi Arabia, has drawn the world's attention to the horrendous behaviour of the Turkish Authorities.    He, quite correctly, has stated that the shooting at unarmed people protesting in Cizre, Turkey, was against their fundamental rights.   This throws up two issues for me; Saudi Arabia has an appalling human rights record and the fact that a Saudi citizen is the head of the UN Human Rights is laughable.    Does he criticise Saudi Arabia or are they off limits? Everyone has known about the flexible way that Turkey deals with the issue of human rights, but they have been assured that the EU will look again at their application to join....surely this should be the nail in the coffin of their ambition to join?   ...