Skip to main content

If it doesn't work on a small scale it sure as hell won't on a global one!

Many years ago, back in the dim mists of time, I lived in a quiet country village in the South East of England.    This village had its usual "idiots" (every village has them) but on the whole they were harmless.   The local bobby had a little station and everyone knew who he was.   The majority of kids lived in fear of being chastised by the bobby, and him telling our parents, so on the whole we did as we were told.

Then in the mid-80's/early 90's some "clever and enlightened" libterd in the county council thought it would be a great idea to bring in some of the more anti-social elements of a infamous council estate from a nearby town (Moulsecombe in Brighton).   

These families were installed in our downland village so they could benefit and learn from the, largely self-policing, society we had.    Apparently, the idea being that the "halcyon idyll"  of village life would tame these anti-social scum bags and they would transform into model citizens.    WRONG!!!   Anyone with half a brain could see that as soon as they stepped foot into our village they would convert some of the kids (who had borderline authority issues) already living on the council estates to full blown anti-social thugs.    

It happened, the newcomers brought their culture with them to the council estates in our village, it supplanted the existing self-policing culture prevalent at the time and the estates descended into areas where one though twice about going.    I lived backing on to one of the estates in our village, when I was little we always went round to play with the kids on the estate because there was no difference between us and them, they rented we didn't, that was it, to me it was just another estate in the village where my friends lived.    Doors were left unlocked and an open door policy was prevalent.

By my teens and early twenties, the situation had deteriorated exponentially, it didn't help that the local families living on the estates were able to buy their houses from the council which also set up a two-tiered them and us vibe within the estates.    So the council built more social housing, because, despite the trouble on the council estates, the village was a desirable one and house prices went through the roof to such an extent that a large number of us that had grown up in the village couldn't afford to stay there.   Many people I knew that couldn't afford to buy a house in the village also didn't qualify for social housing either.    Newcomers were brought in and they were given the social housing over and above local people.   This caused inevitable tensions, particularly because a lot of the newcomers were relocated due to their anti-social behaviour in their previous town/village.

So in conclusion it didn't/doesn't work on a small scale, the agressive dominant anti-social culture of the "scombies" (as they were known) overwhelmed the incumbent passive, self-censuring, law abiding (on the whole!) village culture.    It has to be said that not everyone from the Moulescombe estate was a anti-social moron, my own grandparents lived on an adjacent estate and they knew many people from both estates who were law-abiding, decent people.

Does this ring any bells?    Agressive, anti-social cultures moving into relatively civilised, generally law abiding countries and overwhelming the prevalent culture?   You got it!!!   WELCOME. TO. EUROPE!

IT DIDN'T WORK THEN ON A SMALL DOMESTIC SCALE SO IT SURE AS HELL WON'T WORK ON A GLOBAL ONE.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Demographic suicide of Europe - Can it be reversed?

There is no doubt, to any rational, critical thinking person in the Western world, that Europe is going through as big a crisis as those of WW1 and WW2.   Unfortunately, the crisis we currently find ourselves in has been created or at least abetted by our own political leaders. There has been much talk of the Frankfurt School and the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan, cultural marxism and the creep of Islamism within the West and Europe specifically. We are told that we need to import immigrants from the third world countries in order to fill the demographic hole created by Europeans not breeding sufficiently.   The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan openly advocates the destruction of the European race, or at the very least its dilution.   So for decades, various countries have made it fiscally less and less desirable to procreate.   The married person's tax allowance was removed from UK citizens way back in the nineties, child benefit, in countries where it is paid, has...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lord Taverne slams the will of the people.

Last night (13 March 2017) the House of Commons voted on the Bill to trigger Article 50 of the Lis bon Trea ty .   This Bill allows the government of the UK to set in motion the process of separation from the European Union, nine months after the people of the UK voted, via a referendum, to leave. Despite the best efforts of Gina Miller (a Soros stooge) and a cabal of self-interested parties to block the UK government from trying to exit without parliamentary approval; a move that was upheld by several self-interested High Court and Supreme Court Judges were proven fruitless.   In compliance with the court directive, the UK government tabled a Bill laying out the specifics of exiting the EU.   Passed by the House of Commons, it went up to the House of Lords, who rejected the Bill and returned it to the elected House with amendments.   The amendments were overturned by the elected House of Commons and it has since passed in the House of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pot and Kettle!!!

It never fails to amaze me that some people in positions of power have the nerve to judge countries when their own home nation is not known for banging the same drum..... The UN Human Rights Chief, Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein from Saudi Arabia, has drawn the world's attention to the horrendous behaviour of the Turkish Authorities.    He, quite correctly, has stated that the shooting at unarmed people protesting in Cizre, Turkey, was against their fundamental rights.   This throws up two issues for me; Saudi Arabia has an appalling human rights record and the fact that a Saudi citizen is the head of the UN Human Rights is laughable.    Does he criticise Saudi Arabia or are they off limits? Everyone has known about the flexible way that Turkey deals with the issue of human rights, but they have been assured that the EU will look again at their application to join....surely this should be the nail in the coffin of their ambition to join?   ...
Post a Comment
Read more